H2Hub · Intelligence

    Intelligence for your project

    Every section here answers a question a development stage has to answer — comparable projects, equipment costs, demand, policy and funding — with each fact traceable to its source.

    Back to your project workspace

    Renewable H₂ Break-even Prices

    EUR/kg ranges for grid-connected, off-grid and low-carbon alternatives.

    Data snapshot:EHO July 2026 · IEA Global Hydrogen Review 2026
    Next refresh:Q1 2027
    Grid-connected
    2.8–13.3
    EUR/kg range
    Off-grid
    3.7–16.3
    EUR/kg range
    SMR + CCS
    1.3–3.9
    EUR/kg range
    Fossil + CCS
    1.3–4.8
    EUR/kg range
    Break-even price ranges (EUR/kg)
    Executive Summary

    Grid-connected green hydrogen ranges wide (2.8–13.3 EUR/kg) — you can win or lose on power price alone. SMR + CCS anchors the cost floor at 1.3–3.9 EUR/kg.

    Engineering Insight

    Off-grid renewable projects need dedicated over-build and storage to hit the low end; grid-connected wins on utilisation but pays for it in electricity price.

    Market Insight

    A stable, competitive PPA at ≤ 40 EUR/MWh is the single most important variable for a bankable green-H₂ business case.

    Investment Insight

    Any offtake priced above 6 EUR/kg needs a policy or premium buyer — otherwise the project is competing against SMR + CCS on cost alone.

    Preview: 4 of 4 rows
    CategoryYearMin EUR/kgMax EUR/kg
    Grid-connected20242.813.3
    Off-grid20243.716.3
    SMR + CCS20241.33.9
    Fossil + CCS20241.34.8
    Subscriber download · CSV
    Break-even prices dataset

    EUR/kg ranges by production route and year.

    iea-breakeven-prices.csv · 4 rows

    Data © original publishers (EHO, IEA). Original analysis, verification, and column engineering © ReneEnergy. The original publishers have not reviewed or endorsed this dataset.

    Data: European Hydrogen Observatory (primary) · International Energy Agency (supporting) · Analysis © ReneEnergy.Sources & attribution

    The original publishers have not reviewed or endorsed this analysis.